Pastor Mike began a two-part sermon on the gift of tongues as we finally arrived at 1 Corinthian 14.
Mike started out explaining the roots of the modern tongues movement. According to a recent poll, 11% of American Christians say they speak in tongues! And 30 million attend either charismatic or Pentecostal churches. The Wesley brothers talked about the "second blessing" when one's Christian life hits a new level of sanctification. This "holiness movement" found its way to Bethel Bible College at the beginning of the 20th century and during one particular service, a woman, Agnes Osman, broke into speaking in tongues. Those there took it as confirmation of the second blessing and soon these two ideas became entwined together as students and professors from the College left to take over their own churches.
Mike then defined speaking in tongues under three sub-points:
1. Speech that is initially understood by some. This is the type of tongues we find in Acts 2, 9 and 10 and is speech that is objectively translatable. These words can be found in a dictionary of the foreign language.
2. Speech that is not initially understood by anyone but by God. This speech is subjectively translated. In fact, if you take a recording to various churches, the speech would be translated differently.
3. Speech that is not initially understood by anyone and which occurs in pagan or cultic ceremonies.
Speaking in tongues (or strange/indecipherable speech) is often found in non-Christian cultures including Eskimo, Native American, Greek temple worship, aborigine, etc. So, from the outside, numbers 2 and 3 seem to be the same phenomena.
The question then is no. 2 justified in Scripture. So Pastor Mike began his review of chapter 14 by reminding us that: first, it's a one-sided conversation (we have to infer from Paul's comments what the problem was as the Corinthians obviously did); second, Paul is attempting to correct a problem as we can see from chapters 12 and 13; and, third, we need to separate Paul's imperative remarks (what should be done and which is, therefore, good) and Paul's indicative statements (what is actually happening and could be either good or bad).
He then took us through verses 1-19 and 23-33 and 39-40 and broke those verses out between imperative and indicative statements to help glean the intent (the other verses await next week's sermon). The temporary conclusion was that the way the Corinthians practiced speaking in tongues was unloving, unedifying, unintelligible, unintelligent and uncontrolled.
Have you experienced the tongues phenomena in groups or churches you've visited? Or do you disagree and think that speaking in tongues is "mark" of your spirituality or sanctification?